<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0">
   <channel>
      <title>Pennsylvania Injury Lawyer Blog</title>
      <link>http://www.pennsylvania-injury-lawyer-blog.com/</link>
      <description>Published by Anapol Schwartz</description>
      <language>en</language>
      <copyright>Copyright 2010</copyright>
      <lastBuildDate>Thu, 28 Jan 2010 14:08:17 -0500</lastBuildDate>
      <generator>http://www.sixapart.com/movabletype/?v=3.33</generator>
      <docs>http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/tech/rss</docs> 

            <item>
         <title>Worker at Chemical Plant Killed by Phosgene Exposure</title>
         <description><![CDATA[<p>Chemical plant employers and managers have the responsibility of ensuring that employees who dedicate their lives working for them are protected from exposure to dangerous levels of chemicals, gases, and other toxic materials. Most of these components are harmless if handled in certain quantities, with specific protection, after receiving adequate training, and when following proper procedures.</p>

<p>A recent startribune.com article discusses the death of a West Virginia chemical plant employee. After being exposed on January 23, 2010 to phosgene, a major industrial chemical that is poisonous at room temperature, the worker died the next day. As a result, the chemical plant has shut down while the federal Occupation Health and Safety Administration investigates a series of leaks, three of which were reported over the weekend and one of which went unnoticed for a full week. A plant spokesman said that the plant is reviewing operating procedures and that there is no immediate plan to start-up production. </p>

<p>According to the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, phosgene poisoning varies based on the amount of phosgene that a person is exposed to, the route of exposure, and the length of time in which an individual is exposed. Serious damage can be done to the eyes, nose, skin, throat, and lungs from phosgene gas and liquid exposure. </p>]]></description>
         <link>http://www.pennsylvania-injury-lawyer-blog.com/2010/01/worker_at_chemical_plant_kille.html</link>
         <guid>http://www.pennsylvania-injury-lawyer-blog.com/2010/01/worker_at_chemical_plant_kille.html</guid>
         <category></category>
         <pubDate>Thu, 28 Jan 2010 14:08:17 -0500</pubDate>
      </item>
            <item>
         <title>Fingertip Amputation and Laceration Hazard: 1.5 Million Graco Strollers Recalled</title>
         <description><![CDATA[<p>Approximately 1.5 million Graco strollers, including specific model numbers of Passage, Alano and Spree Strollers and Travel Systems, have been recalled due to a significant fingertip amputation and laceration hazard. According to a fox43.com report, the Consumer Product Safety Commission (CPSC) announced the stroller recall on January 20, 2010 due to the risk posed to children when the canopy of the designated strollers are opened or closed. Consumers are advised to stop using the strollers and contact Exton, PA-based Graco Children’s Products Inc. for a free repair kit.</p>

<p>The strollers were recalled after Graco received reports of five children having their fingertips severed, leaving them disfigured, and two children receiving cuts on their fingertips. Apparently the risk of these injuries is presented when a child places their fingers in the stroller’s canopy hinge as the canopy is being opened or closed. The strollers were sold nationwide between October 2004 and December 2009 at multiple stores including Target, Wall-Mart, Babies R Us, Sears, Toys R Us, Burlington Coat Factory, and many others.</p>]]></description>
         <link>http://www.pennsylvania-injury-lawyer-blog.com/2010/01/fingertip_amputation_laceration_hazard_graco_strollers_recall_injury_attorneys.html</link>
         <guid>http://www.pennsylvania-injury-lawyer-blog.com/2010/01/fingertip_amputation_laceration_hazard_graco_strollers_recall_injury_attorneys.html</guid>
         <category>Defective Strollers</category>
         <pubDate>Fri, 22 Jan 2010 15:10:43 -0500</pubDate>
      </item>
            <item>
         <title>Derry Man Dies After 65&apos; GTO Fails at Railroad Crossing</title>
         <description><![CDATA[<p>A 61-year-old man from Derry recently lost control of his vehicle in Westmoreland County.  Reportedly, the man had just purchased a 1965 Pontiac GTO and was on his way home when the car suddenly failed to stop, came to rest on railroad tracks, and was then struck by a Norfolk Southern freight train. The operator of the train did attempt to apply the train’s brakes prior to striking the car, but was unable to stop in time. This incident marks the third fatality involving a train to have taken place in Derry since this past summer.</p>

<p>According to Pittsburgh’s ABC affiliate, WTAE-TV channel 4, the man was able to bail out of the vehicle prior to the collision, and was found about 40 yards from the scene of the accident. It was determined that the 61-year-old died at the scene from blunt force head trauma. Police are investigating the accident and trying to determine what exactly went wrong with the vehicle. In accidents where vehicle malfunction plays some sort of contributing factor, it is important to attribute any instance of negligent action to the appropriate party so that they can be held liable for their actions. Although the vehicle involved certainly wasn’t brand new, the man involved in the accident had purchased the vehicle the very day that the accident took place. Whether or not the seller of the car knew that there was something wrong with the vehicle is yet to be determined.</p>]]></description>
         <link>http://www.pennsylvania-injury-lawyer-blog.com/2010/01/derry_man_dies_after_65_gto_fa.html</link>
         <guid>http://www.pennsylvania-injury-lawyer-blog.com/2010/01/derry_man_dies_after_65_gto_fa.html</guid>
         <category>Auto Accident</category>
         <pubDate>Wed, 13 Jan 2010 07:00:00 -0500</pubDate>
      </item>
            <item>
         <title>Three Mile Island Radiation Leak Causes Workers to Evacuate</title>
         <description><![CDATA[<p>Located just south of Harrisburg, Pennsylvania, Three Mile Island, the scene of the worst nuclear disaster in United States history, is again making headlines, this time for a radiation leak that forced the evacuation of 150 workers. According to an english.cctv.com article, workers were generally exposed to low levels, although one worker was found to have been exposed to 16 millirems of radiation, which is the equivalent of about three X-rays worth. Reportedly, the leak did not pose a threat to public health or safety.</p>

<p>While there was no further mention of worker illness, any illnesses that do arise could result in the power plant being held accountable. Employers have an obligation to provide their employees with safe working environments, even in a place such as a nuclear power plant. In the event that an employee falls ill because of hazardous conditions in the workplace, the employee may have the right to seek compensatory damages from their employer. Such compensation can assist with costs associated with an accident or illness, such as medical bills, loss of wages, and physical therapy fees.</p>]]></description>
         <link>http://www.pennsylvania-injury-lawyer-blog.com/2010/01/three_mile_island_radiation_le.html</link>
         <guid>http://www.pennsylvania-injury-lawyer-blog.com/2010/01/three_mile_island_radiation_le.html</guid>
         <category>Environmental Toxins</category>
         <pubDate>Fri, 08 Jan 2010 07:00:00 -0500</pubDate>
      </item>
            <item>
         <title>Icy Road Conditions in Pennsylvania Contribute to SEPTA Crash that Injured 10</title>
         <description><![CDATA[<p>Inclement weather conditions contribute towards a large number of traffic accidents each and every year. According to a philly.com article, multiple accidents have been occurring in Pennsylvania and New Jersey as a result of icy road conditions. Reportedly, a Blue Route accident involving a Southeastern Pennsylvania Transportation Authority (SEPTA) bus and two other vehicles took place when the bus crashed into the two vehicles that had already been involved in a crash with each other. According to the article, a total of 10 bus passengers were injured. There was no mention of injuries sustained by the motorists of the two other vehicles involved.</p>

<p>Inclement weather conditions are certainly not the fault of motorists, but driving recklessly in such conditions is. Reckless driving practices result in far too many Pennsylvania auto accidents each year. In the event that a motorist chooses to drive in a reckless manner, that motorist can be held liable for injuries and other damages that take place as a result of said reckless driving practice. </p>]]></description>
         <link>http://www.pennsylvania-injury-lawyer-blog.com/2010/01/icy_road_conditions_in_pennsyl.html</link>
         <guid>http://www.pennsylvania-injury-lawyer-blog.com/2010/01/icy_road_conditions_in_pennsyl.html</guid>
         <category>Bus Accident</category>
         <pubDate>Wed, 06 Jan 2010 18:09:02 -0500</pubDate>
      </item>
            <item>
         <title>West Philly Trolley and Car Collide Injuring Six</title>
         <description><![CDATA[<p>According to a report from KYW 1060 News Radio, a total of six people sustained minor injuries when a trolley collided with a passenger car in West Philadelphia. The accident occurred near South 36th Street and Market, and involved five adults and one child.  The injured adults were taken to the Hospital of the University of Pennsylvania, while the lone child was taken to Children’s Hospital. None of the involved individuals sustained major injuries, and the cause of the crash is still being investigated.</p>

<p>Traffic accidents in Pennsylvania always need to be carefully examined to ensure that the negligent party deemed responsible for the accident is held accountable for his or her actions.  Furthermore, it needs to be investigated as to whether or not some other entity played a contributing role in the accident as well. That is, if a faulty auto part leads to an accident, then the manufacturer of that part can be declared negligent in their ability to provide the consumer with a supposedly safe product.</p>]]></description>
         <link>http://www.pennsylvania-injury-lawyer-blog.com/2009/12/west_philly_trolley_and_car_co.html</link>
         <guid>http://www.pennsylvania-injury-lawyer-blog.com/2009/12/west_philly_trolley_and_car_co.html</guid>
         <category>Auto Accident</category>
         <pubDate>Thu, 31 Dec 2009 07:00:00 -0500</pubDate>
      </item>
            <item>
         <title>Energy Efficient Traffic Lights Prone to Frost Buildup, Pose Danger to Motorists</title>
         <description><![CDATA[<p>Energy conservation is becoming more and more commonplace amongst not only private citizens, but businesses and other entities who are seeking to be more eco-friendly. However, not all ideas are as effective as they are in theory when put into action. According to an ajc.com article, energy-efficient traffic lights are doing more than just cutting down on energy usage. They’re also cutting down on how safe motorists are while traversing city streets equipped with the LED-powered lights.</p>

<p>Reportedly, the traffic lights outfitted with the energy-efficient light bulbs are not creating enough heat during their usage, which makes traveling in freezing temperatures rather difficult. The reason for this is that frost can now easily build up over the traffic light lens, making it impossible for a motorist to be completely sure as to which traffic law must be obeyed. The issue has already led to dozens of traffic accidents, one of which included a motorist fatality. While governing authorities cite monetary savings as a significant factor in installing the efficient bulbs, opponents of the move can cite several cases where individuals were involved in car accidents as a result of the low heat-producing light bulbs that contributed towards the obstruction of a traffic signal.</p>

<p>Municipalities have a responsibility to provide and maintain safe road conditions for city residents and visitors alike. In the event that a governing body fails to provide such conditions, then that government entity may be held liable for damages resulting from said instance of improperly maintained conditions. Ultimately, if a city fails to provide safe conditions and does not address and correct known problems in a timely manner, then the city is exercising negligent behavior that needs to be addressed in a court of law.</p>]]></description>
         <link>http://www.pennsylvania-injury-lawyer-blog.com/2009/12/energy_efficient_traffic_light.html</link>
         <guid>http://www.pennsylvania-injury-lawyer-blog.com/2009/12/energy_efficient_traffic_light.html</guid>
         <category>Auto Accident</category>
         <pubDate>Tue, 29 Dec 2009 19:30:16 -0500</pubDate>
      </item>
            <item>
         <title>FDA Bill Seeks to Safeguard Against Food Borne Illness</title>
         <description><![CDATA[<p>As consumers, we assume that the products we use are safe. This is never more applicable than in our consumption of food. According to a nj.com article, a long-awaited bill proposed by the Senate to overhaul the food safety system set forth by the Food and Drug Administration has been unanimously approved. However, it still needs to go for a floor vote, which is speculated to not take place until sometime in 2010. The bill will allow the FDA to recall tainted food rather than simply make a request to the manufacturer of the food to do so, and will also require food manufacturing plants, especially high-risk facilities, to be regularly inspected.</p>

<p>Currently, the FDA is responsible for safeguarding nearly 80% of the food supply in the U.S.  However, safeguarding against food-borne illness does not always prevent the public from falling ill due to tainted food. Currently, it is estimated that nearly 76 million Americans are affected each year by food-borne pathogens. According to the Centers for Disease Control, 5,000 people die annually due to such illness.</p>]]></description>
         <link>http://www.pennsylvania-injury-lawyer-blog.com/2009/12/fda_bill_seeks_to_safeguard_ag.html</link>
         <guid>http://www.pennsylvania-injury-lawyer-blog.com/2009/12/fda_bill_seeks_to_safeguard_ag.html</guid>
         <category>FDA Information</category>
         <pubDate>Wed, 23 Dec 2009 07:00:00 -0500</pubDate>
      </item>
            <item>
         <title>Slim-Fast Consumers Beware: Possible Bacillus Contamination Poses Risk</title>
         <description><![CDATA[<p>Unilever, the maker of the popular weight loss drink Slim-Fast, has recalled 10 million cans of its canned diet drinks because they may be tainted by bacterial contamination. According to a yahoo.com report, Unilever believes that the dietary aid may be tainted by Bacillus cereus, a bacteria that can cause nausea, vomiting, and diarrhea. The recall only affects ready-to-drink Slim-Fast products, and not the brand’s powdered shakes or snack bars.</p>

<p>The <a href="http://www.fda-reports.com/">Food and Drug Administration</a> (FDA) became aware of the problem and notified Unilever of the possible contamination on December 2, 2009. The FDA is currently investigating the matter, paying particular attention to a production facility in Covington, Tennessee. Customers who have in their possession such canned drinks should immediately discard those drinks and may contact Unilever at 1-800-896-9479 for a full refund.</p>]]></description>
         <link>http://www.pennsylvania-injury-lawyer-blog.com/2009/12/slim-fast_consumers_beware_possible_bacillus_contamination_poses_risk.html</link>
         <guid>http://www.pennsylvania-injury-lawyer-blog.com/2009/12/slim-fast_consumers_beware_possible_bacillus_contamination_poses_risk.html</guid>
         <category>Food Recalls</category>
         <pubDate>Mon, 21 Dec 2009 07:00:00 -0500</pubDate>
      </item>
            <item>
         <title>H1N1 Vaccine Recall Reveals Vaccine Doesn&apos;t Always Deliver as Promised</title>
         <description><![CDATA[<p>The H1N1 vaccine is doing more, and less, than it’s supposed to.  According to reports from both ABC News and MSNBC.com, the swine flu vaccine is not always providing the necessary safeguard against the swine flu, and is even ladling some users with unwanted side effects in the form of allergic reactions.</p>

<p>An ABCNews.com report has revealed that a batch of the H1N1 vaccine has been recalled in Canada.  Its maker, U.K.-based GlaxoSmithKline, has recalled the vaccine because it has caused at least six known cases of severe allergic reaction in its users.  So far, 170,000 doses of the vaccine have been recalled in Canada. Although reports claim that this side effect is limited to the vaccine distributed in Canada, it has yet to be seen whether or not other users in different locations are also affected by this defect. A total of 7.5 million doses of the vaccine have been distributed in Canada thus far.</p>

<p>MSNBC.com reports a completely different issue, this time one that has affected children.  According to the article, over 800,000 doses of the H1N1 vaccine have been recalled by Sanofi Pasteur, the vaccine’s division of France-based pharmaceutical company Sanofi-Aventis Group.  It has been determined that these particular doses of the vaccine are ineffective in preventing the onset of swine flu, thus putting children inoculated with the vaccine at risk of contracting the illness. The doses in question have minimal to no potency, and were distributed amongst children.</p>]]></description>
         <link>http://www.pennsylvania-injury-lawyer-blog.com/2009/12/h1n1_vaccine_recall_drug_injury_lawyers.html</link>
         <guid>http://www.pennsylvania-injury-lawyer-blog.com/2009/12/h1n1_vaccine_recall_drug_injury_lawyers.html</guid>
         <category>Recalled Drugs</category>
         <pubDate>Fri, 18 Dec 2009 13:09:51 -0500</pubDate>
      </item>
            <item>
         <title>Shopping Center Evacuated: Employees and Customers Feel Sick after Smelling Gas</title>
         <description><![CDATA[<p>A recent article from gazette.net reported that a Giant Food Store was evacuated after multiple customers and employees (approximately 14 all together) complained about feeling sick and having trouble breathing after smelling gas within the building.  Six of the sick individuals, two Giant customers and four employees, were taken to local hospitals in Maryland for evaluation. According to the article, no gas leak was discovered on the premises and officials are still not sure what made the individuals sick.<br />
  <br />
After evacuating the building shortly after the several reports of people feeling ill, a hazardous materials team responded and investigated the possibility of a gas or Freon leak. However, these possibilities were cancelled out, with no other explanation discovered or provided. As a safety precaution for people within close distance to the area in question, police temporarily closed off certain access points to the shopping center where the Giant Food Store is located. Many other surrounding businesses were also evacuated and others were left to make their own determinations whether or not to evacuate. </p>]]></description>
         <link>http://www.pennsylvania-injury-lawyer-blog.com/2009/12/shopping_center_evacuated_empl.html</link>
         <guid>http://www.pennsylvania-injury-lawyer-blog.com/2009/12/shopping_center_evacuated_empl.html</guid>
         <category>Environmental Toxins</category>
         <pubDate>Thu, 10 Dec 2009 07:00:00 -0500</pubDate>
      </item>
            <item>
         <title> FDA Initiates Study of Lasik Eye Surgery&apos;s Negative Effects</title>
         <description><![CDATA[<p>The Food and Drug Administration has declared its plans to begin a study of the negative side effects following Lasik eye surgery, which include dry eyes, blurred/double vision, and halos around objects at night. According to a recent report, the FDA will coordinate with the Department of Defense and the National Eye Institute to establish the percentage of patients who have been negatively affected by the eye-correcting procedure.</p>

<p>Although it is encouraging that such action is finally being initiated, a clinical trial tracking of patients who undergo the surgery will not conclude until 2012. To start things off, an online questionnaire will help patients gauge their quality of life after Lasik surgery. The head of the FDA’s medical device division stated, “This study will enhance our understanding of the risks of Lasik and could lead to a reduction in patients who experience adverse effects.”</p>

<p>Considering that approximately 6 million Americans have had Lasik surgery, an extremely sensitive procedure that everlastingly reshapes the cornea (a clear layer covering the eye), it is of the utmost importance that the FDA administers this study. Although 95% of Lasik patients are apparently satisfied with the results of their surgery, last summer the FDA received 140 reports of Lasik-related problems of eye damage between 1998 and 2006.</p>]]></description>
         <link>http://www.pennsylvania-injury-lawyer-blog.com/2009/12/fda_initiates_study_of_lasik_e.html</link>
         <guid>http://www.pennsylvania-injury-lawyer-blog.com/2009/12/fda_initiates_study_of_lasik_e.html</guid>
         <category>FDA Information</category>
         <pubDate>Tue, 08 Dec 2009 07:00:00 -0500</pubDate>
      </item>
            <item>
         <title>Radiation Overdoses Linked to Hospital&apos;s Mistake</title>
         <description><![CDATA[<p>A recent latimes.com article has left patients and citizens throughout the United States horrified and concerned about the quality of care provided during CT scans and other hospital services. According to the report, over 200 brain scans for potential stroke patients on a CT scan machine at Cedars-Sinai in California were conducted at eight times the normal level of radiation. Apparently many cases of radiation overdoses at the Los Angeles based medical center have been connected to a mistake the hospital made when resetting a CT scanner to accommodate new protocol for a specific kind of scan used to identify and diagnose strokes. </p>

<p>What is even more shocking is that this serious hospital error went unnoticed for 18 months. The problem was brought to the attention of the hospital in August 2009 when a stroke patient told the hospital that he had begun to lose his hair after a CT stroke scan. A hospital spokesman told reports that the CT machine was used for other kinds of scans, but that the re-set error only affected the potential stroke patients. However, each patient who received the CT brain perfusion scan procedure for stroke diagnosis was exposed to the radiation overdose. The hospital has found and gotten in touch with 206 patients who were subjected to the overdoses at Cedars-Sinai Medical Center. After doing so, the hospital discovered that approximately forty-percent of the patients had endured sporadic hair loss and many of the individuals also showed signs of reddening of the skin.</p>]]></description>
         <link>http://www.pennsylvania-injury-lawyer-blog.com/2009/12/radiation_overdoses_linked_to.html</link>
         <guid>http://www.pennsylvania-injury-lawyer-blog.com/2009/12/radiation_overdoses_linked_to.html</guid>
         <category>Medical Malpractice</category>
         <pubDate>Thu, 03 Dec 2009 07:00:00 -0500</pubDate>
      </item>
            <item>
         <title>Robinson Township Auto Collision Kills 1</title>
         <description><![CDATA[<p>A recent article from thepittsburghchannel.com reported that a fatal head-on auto collision between a passenger car and a UPS truck in Pennsylvania took the life of the passenger car driver. The UPS truck driver’s condition was not provided but the article stated that he was taken to a local hospital. According to police, the car swerved out of control after skidding on some oil that was on the road. Although the article does not mention at what speeds the vehicles collided, considered the catastrophic consequences of the head-on crash, it is fair to say that speed may have been a factor. </p>

<p>When auto accidents are caused by foreign substances on the road, such as excessive oil, or by poor road conditions, these factors are unfortunately enough to cause vehicles to lose control, taking an automobile in unexpected directions and resulting in a collision with other vehicles. Head-on collisions in Pennsylvania are some of the most serious auto accidents to take place due to the vulnerability of drivers and front-seat passengers, especially for individuals in small passenger cars who are involved in accidents with larger vehicles like delivery trucks and SUVs. </p>]]></description>
         <link>http://www.pennsylvania-injury-lawyer-blog.com/2009/12/robinson_township_auto_collisi.html</link>
         <guid>http://www.pennsylvania-injury-lawyer-blog.com/2009/12/robinson_township_auto_collisi.html</guid>
         <category>Auto Accident</category>
         <pubDate>Tue, 01 Dec 2009 07:00:00 -0500</pubDate>
      </item>
            <item>
         <title>FDA Launches &quot;Safe Use Initiative&quot; to Lower Drug Dosage Errors</title>
         <description><![CDATA[<p>In what many people are referring to as “long overdue”, the FDA has recently announced its new program called “The Safe Use Initiative” to help lower wide-ranging problems associated with drug dose errors. According to a latimes.com report, the problem of drug dosage error takes a staggering toll on consumer and patient health in addition to costing about $4 billion a year. In fact, based on a study by the Institute of Medicine in 2007, approximately 1.5 million preventable “adverse drug events” take place in the United States every year. With this information in mind, it is no wonder that the Food and Drug Administration is calling on doctors, consumers, and various other healthcare professionals to help in identifying drugs and circumstances that may be particular problems. </p>

<p>In its efforts to lower the deaths and severe health problems brought about by misuses of medication, the <a href="http://www.fda-reports.com/fda-adverse-reporting-system.html">FDA adverse event reporting system</a> and the organization as a whole are trying to determine the most serious threats, dangers, and risks, and find ways to prevent them from happening. The agency is supposed to hold public hearings to gather information pertaining to the following drug concerns:<br />
<ul><li>Overuse of acetaminophen (a pain reliever that can cause liver damage if too much is taken)</li><br />
<li>Information given to patients (i.e. package inserts, labels and instructions that pharmacists distribute when giving prescriptions)</li><br />
<li>Ways to lower dosage errors in liquid medications by including a spoon or cup to accurately regulate a dosage</li></ul></p>]]></description>
         <link>http://www.pennsylvania-injury-lawyer-blog.com/2009/11/fda_launches_safe_use_initiative_to_lower_drug_dosage_errors.html</link>
         <guid>http://www.pennsylvania-injury-lawyer-blog.com/2009/11/fda_launches_safe_use_initiative_to_lower_drug_dosage_errors.html</guid>
         <category>FDA Information</category>
         <pubDate>Fri, 27 Nov 2009 07:00:00 -0500</pubDate>
      </item>
      
   </channel>
</rss>
